Sajjad Haider & Associates > Services
> Business Improvement Services
- Internal Audit
- Operations Audit
- Business Performance Evaluation
- Monthly Review Meetings
Internal
Audit
THE CHANGING ROLE OF INTERNAL AUDITING
As organisations move from the traditional economy to the
new economy, the role of auditing too has undergone a metamorphosis.
The traditional role of internal auditing was one of security,
compliance, certification and investigation. Its emerging
role, however, is constructive, participative, consultative,
proactive, advisory and catalytic.
Similarly, the traditional audit areas of
accounting have expanded to include: Operations, Marketing,
Finance, Human Resources, Information Systems, Environment,
Quality and Re-engineering. This leads to a shift of emphasis
shifting from financial controls to managerial, strategic
and operational controls.
With the emerging methodology focusing on
risk evaluation, controls appraisal, CAATs, statistical tools,
the internal auditor’s role demands multi-disciplinary
skills and an in-depth knowledge of business.
Designed, as it is, to add value and improve
an organisation’s operations, Internal Auditing helps
an organisation accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic,
disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness
of risk management, control and governance process.
Internal Auditing, therefore, will focus
more on where a business is going rather than simply on where
it has been.
- Identification of key business risks and consideration of
the possible consequences, if business risks are not addressed;
- Identification of the universe of auditable
entities, functional activities, and regulatory requirements;
- Determination of significant auditable
entities;
- Evaluations of whether controls within
the context of each auditable entity reviewed adequately address
business risk - in particular, are the internal control criteria,
such as that of COSO, met?
- Identification of appropriate controls
relative to operating policies, management's financial statement
assertions, and compliance with statutes;
- Evaluation of findings from both a quantitative
and qualitative perspective, as appropriate;
- Recommendations for improvements in controls;
- Discussion of findings, conclusions, and
recommendations at appropriate levels of management before
issuing final reports;
- Incorporation of references to management
actions into the internal auditing report, as deemed appropriate;
- After an audit examination is completed,
issuance of a report that presents the purpose, scope, and
results of the audit, including an expression of the auditor's
opinion, as appropriate;
- Follow-up on management actions to determine
that corrective action was taken and is achieving desired
results or the board has assumed the risk of not taking corrective
action on reported findings;
- Issuance of a summary internal auditing
report on the system of internal control based on evidence
gathered during the internal auditing process, considering
whether significant control weaknesses exist in the system
of internal control, evaluating their pervasiveness, and issuing
a report, accordingly.
Operations
Audit
I. Object of Operations
Audit
1. Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness
of the operations in order to achieve the business objectives;
2. Evaluate the Financial and Information
Systems which enables:
-
Cost control
-
Strategic Planning
-
Decision Making
3. Policies and procedures aud
II. Methodology
1. Preliminary Survey and System
Study
A detailed system study will be carried out
before the commencement of the audit in order to have an understanding
of:
2. Fieldwork
A thorough analysis of the various segments
of the organization will be carried out in order to ensure
that:
-
Sufficient internal controls are in place at all levels
of the organization;
-
Routine functions of the organization are carried
out within the framework of the policies and procedures
approved by the management;
-
Policies and procedures of the organization help in
directing the appropriate authorities that have been
delegated with the powers to undertake strategic decisions;
-
Timely completion and submission of the required deliverables.
3. Audit Reporting
The findings will be evaluated in the light
of the following aspects:
Criteria |
What the operation is supposed to accomplish |
Condition |
What the operation is actually accomplishing |
Cause |
Why the deviation from the criteria has occurred
|
Effect |
What’s happening or could happen because
conditions do not meet criteria |
Conclusions |
What needs to be corrected / improved |
Recommendation |
How can the correction / improvement
be implemented |
Business
Performance Evaluation
What is BPE?
Business Process Evaluation (BPE) is a discipline
that utilizes a variety of management and accounting techniques
for the purpose of identifying the weaknesses in existing
structure processes and practices if any, and looks toward
ways in which these processes may be analyzed, evaluated and,
ultimately, improved.
Business Process Reengineering (BPR) / Systems and Operations
audit as the case normally follows such an evaluation, which
focuses on devising and prioritizing solutions to these identified
problems through the reorganization of selected processes,
re-distribution of tasks and process throughput, and the deployment
of the appropriate technology to achieve the desired enterprise
objectives.
Why BPE?
An enterprise through its continued existence
and growth, acquires sub optimal, induced systems and practices,
not envisaged during the project phase. Costs mount and profit
margin shrinks. More often than not, such sub optimal systems
and practices are brought about by crisis management, short
time solutions, and non-adoption of appropriate and latest
technology, absence of professional management and to a certain
extent lack of focused approach. Unless identified and removed,
these will continue to erode the already meager profitability
- hence the need for a BPE.
BPE should not be construed as a one-time
exercise. It should be repeated as often as necessary, whenever
declining margins are noticed or after a definite interval
of time.
Components of BPE
A typical Business Performance Evaluation assignment would
cover the following aspects:
Division
into
functional area |
 |
| Criteria
for Risk Evaluation |
 |
| Assignment
of Weightings |
 |
| Evaluation
of Criteria as identified above |
 |
Arriving
at the
Area Score |
 |
| Prioritise
area for immediate action |
| |
|
Monthly
Review Meetings
CHALLENGES FACED IN THE NEW ECONOMY
The present business scenario is different
from what existed a decade ago. Customer retention is no longer
a given proposition. Rather a prized possession that has to
be won against tough and ever increasing competition. With
the opening up of the economy and free trade policies, companies
are going to be tested with competition from the global market.
Unless the company adapts to this situation, its profitability
and growth is going to be in jeopardy.
Periodical performance reviews, conducted
in the form of Monthly Review Meetings (MRM’s), are
an integral part of Total Cost Management Solution, preceded
by several steps, such as Identification of Critical Success
Factors (CSF’s) and Key performance Indicators (KPI’s),
Core group formation and assignment of responsibilities, identification
of deliverables, Fixing of targets for achievement etc. The
focus will be on CSF’s and KPI’s leading to cost
reduction, cost control and customer satisfaction
CONCEPT AND IMPORTANCE OF MONTHLY
REVIEW MEETINGS (MRM)
MRM’s are a means for critically analysing,
through a periodical executive level meeting, deviations of
a specifically selected set of Key Performance Indicators
(KPI’s), over the time elapsed between two successive
meetings, against preset desirable norms. As a corollary,
it also follows that, action points would have to be evolved,
during each MRM, to set in motion activities which would ensure
that such deviations are not only corrected with a minimum
of time delay, but also install control points for prevention
of recurrence. Progress on these action points would then
perforce be discussed at successive MRM’s, till such
time the issue is satisfactorily resolved.
The KPI’s themselves are carefully chosen parameters,
which will ensure organisational effectiveness. Their selection
will have to be based on Critical Success Factors (CSF’s)
for each process.
What are Critical Success Factors
(CSF’s)?
* Essential enablers focused on the process;
* A thing or condition required for optimal success or an
activity recommended for optimal success;
* The most important things to do, to increase the probability
of the success of the process;
* Observable, usually measurable, characteristics of the organisation
and process;
* Either strategic, technological, organisational or procedural
in nature;
* Expressed in terms of processes and not the whole business.
What are Key Performance Indicators
(KPI’s)?
* A measure of how well the process is performing;
* Predicts the probability of success or failure in future
of the process;
* Process oriented;
* Expressed precisely in measurable terms;
* Will help improve the process when measured and acted upon;
* Will focus on those resources identified as the most important
for this process.
Thus the effectiveness of MRM concept relies
on three important factors:-
1. Identification of CSF’s;
2. Careful selection of, and setting desirable
norms to KPI’s, covering the entire spectrum of the
enterprise activity from Marketing/Sales to Production to
dispatch and realisation of sales proceeds;
3. Continuity of MRM’s through which,
resolution of all action points are ensured, by clearly defining
the activities to be undertaken for correction of observed
deviations and also by assigning non-transferable responsibilities
to designated individuals.
|